RANCHI, India, April 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 9: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. In the instant applicat... Read More
RANCHI, India, April 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 9: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw this writ petition to file appropriate pe... Read More
RANCHI, India, April 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 9: 1. Ms. Anushka Swadha, learned counsel, under the instruction of Mr. Pankaj Srivastava, learned counsel for the a... Read More
RANCHI, India, April 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 9: 1. The instant civil review petition has been filed to review the order passed by this Court on 15.12.2025 in C.M... Read More
RANCHI, India, April 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 9: 1. Heard Mr. B.M. Tripathi, learned senior counsel for the appellants in Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 337 of 2020 and Mr. ... Read More
RANCHI, India, April 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 9: 1. Heard Mr. Jitendra S. Singh, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned Special P.P. appearin... Read More
RANCHI, India, April 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 9: 1. Heard Mr. Jitendra S. Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Vishwanath Roy, learned Spl.P.P. 2. T... Read More
RANCHI, India, April 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 9: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. I.A. No.4966 of 2025 seeks condonation of delay of 101 days in ins... Read More
RANCHI, India, April 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 9: 1. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 for setting aside the jud... Read More
GUWAHATI, India, April 7 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on March 5: Mr. Y S Mannan, learned counsel for the appellant submits that respondent No. 3 is not a necessary party in the c... Read More